Feedvisor alternatives: compare and decide

There is no doubt that the e-commerce sector is growing rapidly every day. With so many new competitors joining the race for new customers, each detail matters. When it comes to competitors’ price monitoring, there is plenty of information that can get you ahead of them all.
 
That’s why price tracking software is a must-have in today’s e-commerce world. More data about competitors and their prices mean more room for improvement in your business. It results in better chances of reaching clients that your companies serve. There are tons of tools that help e-commerce businesses grow.
 
If you’re looking for a Feedvisor alternative, you couldn’t have found a better place for it! In this article, we will discuss the differences between Feedvisor and Dealavo.
 
We will go through basic and advanced features, costs, and implementation. With our help, not only you will be given all the information needed, but you will also be able to decide which one suits your company the best. Let’s start with a fundamental question.

Dynamic or static pricing?

When setting up a business, one of the key questions the owner has to ask himself is whether to choose dynamic or static pricing.
Static pricing is more of a traditional model in which a product’s price is fixed and stays the same regardless of changing market trends or competitors’ moves.
 
This method can be extremely useful when it comes to manufacturers as they are keener on establishing fixed prices for every single customer they have.
 
On the other hand, there’s dynamic pricing that allows changing products’ prices multiple times, as soon as a product’s price starts to fluctuate due to competitors’ moves or demand changes.
This strategy is widely used in the e-commerce sector. Changing a product’s price might be vital when it comes to adapting to new market trends or just staying ahead of the competition.
 
Dynamic pricing is getting more and more popular in the e-commerce industry, as it fits its principles – often price changes and strong demand fluctuations.
 
wiser solutions

Both Feedvisor and Dealavo enable their clients to monitor, set, and develop new prices, based on accurate data about competitors’ actions, demand, and supply changes. That is very important to create sales with proper prices.

 
In the e-commerce sector, the more accurate the prices are, the more clients they can satisfy. As simple as that. Let’s be honest, nowadays everyone looks for cheaper alternatives to a given product online.
 
Repricing is the best way to efficiently stick with the implementation of a given pricing policy.
 

What’s easier to use – Feedvisor or Dealavo?

 
Ease of use is probably one of the most underrated features when it comes to price tracking software. At first, it might seem logical because everyone expects the tool to accurately track competitors’ prices and nothing besides that.
 
However, after some time of using a tool that is really complicated and only experienced managers can make use of it, frustration takes over. That’s why ease of use should be one of the key factors when deciding to choose software for your business.
 
While choosing the best price tracking software it is also vital to differentiate a company’s primary goals. If a tool is well-matched with a company, it’s naturally easier to use. It’s also important to state, that there is no software that fits into every business and every industry.
 
Feedvisor is an integrated optimization and intelligence platform focused on advertising and pricing optimization. It provides an end-to-end brand management service to help brands grow and boost their presence. Their main goal is to serve enterprise sellers on platforms such as Amazon.
 
When it comes to ease of use, Feedvisor is highly rated as it’s very intuitive and clear.
 
Dealavo’s twofold structure (divided into brands and e-shops) allows it to meet the company’s profile and main needs.
 
Dealavo is a very handy tool that can be used in a very wide spectrum of businesses, gathering tons of data from different e-commerce channels and presenting it most conveniently, so that even beginners won’t feel overwhelmed with it.
It’s not only useful in the everyday price tracking process but also while planning long-term pricing or distribution strategy.
 
All this makes Dealavo a great, intuitive tool for e-commerce brands but also a universal solution for businesses with completely different missions and goals.

Dealavo as a Feedvisor alternative – essential features

As for the Feedvisor alternative, Dealavo would fit in well in almost every e-commerce business possible, because of its universal purpose and features that go beyond expectations.
 
Both Dealavo and Feedvisor serve a wide range of features such as Machine Learning Component, Banner Monitoring, Offline and Online Stock Pricing, Open API and many more.
 

Additional QA human verification

 
If we were to indicate one key feature that distinguishes Dealavo from Feedvisor, it would be additional QA human verification.
 
ML Component and the AI systems might be gathering data, recognizing patterns and predicting future outcomes, but there’s always a human brain that catches the smallest errors if algorithms get stuck.
 
Dealavo developed a separate team to manually verify all the collected data from different sources. It’s the combination of the Machine Learning component with human operators that gives the highest quality data to achieve their partners’ business goals guaranteed under SLA.

Feedvisor and Dealavo – advanced features comparison.

If you are in charge of an e-commerce store or brand, there’s one thing that’s undeniably key for you. It’s a range of advanced features you can use, that will get you ahead of your competition. A wide spectrum of basic and advanced features can provide great improvements in your brand’s pricing strategy. Take a closer look at the data comparing crucial features across both tools:

Price

While Feedvisor offers four pricing editions (from 1.000$ up to 2.500$), Dealavo’s prices start at 140$ per month. Therefore, there is quite a gap between both tools when it comes to minimal price.